<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=383903128744636&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

 

 

Share this post now:
   

2020 Energy Prices Complicated by Ag Products, Renewable Credits and Other Relationships

Posted by Tom Kloza on Feb 4, 2021 4:45:00 PM
Find me on:

You need more than just a NYMEX or ICE futures’ screen to keep pace with petroleum prices, based on the first 22 business days of 2021. Crude oil prices sprinted out of the gate in the first full week of the new year, but prices for Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits, bean oil, and even ethanol occupied much of the downstream fuel limelight in subsequent sessions.

Trading of RINs, which can be a riddle to even some seasoned energy market players, has been particularly dramatic.

Uncertainty over EPA’s delayed 2021 renewable fuel blending targets, a bankruptcy by a substantial RIN trading house, and the ever-changing relationship between the bio and hydrocarbon components of finished fuel have dominated the action so far this year.

And those elements conspired to send compliance costs for refiners, importers, which are obligated parties under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) to their highest level ever, including numbers seen during the height of “RINsanity” in July 2013, when ethanol RINs flirted with the $1.50/credit mark.

Refiners hosting earnings’ conference calls may be tempted not to comment on these costs, particularly after devastating 2020 losses on transportation fuels that were mostly attributable to the impact of the COVID pandemic.
OPIS computes a daily Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO) value that illustrates the approximate implied cost of RFS program compliance. On Friday, Jan. 29, the RVO assessment was 13.55cts gal, the highest level in the 13-year history of OPIS’s RIN assessments.

For all of January, the RVO average was 11.266cts/gal. That compares with the January 2020 average of just 2.531cts/gal. Put simply, compliance costs for RFS were up nearly 450% in the first month of 2021.

OPIS-Implied-Cost-RFS-Compliance-RVO

Click image to enlarge.

The cost impacts refiners and importers differently, depending on whether they do a lot of blending, have an integrated network of distributors and stations, or move a substantial volume of transportation fuel offshore where RIN obligations are avoided. Under the worst of circumstances, a pure “merchant” refiner might see it refining margins sliced by more than $5.50 bbl if it simply moves bulk product via barge or pipeline and refrains from downstream blending.

Many of the daily price increases in RBOB futures this year have been fueled by rising RIN values. Daily increases in the 2021 D6 (ethanol) RINs of 5-10cts gal were common in January. The rising compliance costs were often a tip-off of the need for wider paper “cracks” for RBOB versus the WTI or Brent benchmarks. Unfortunately, simply looking at futures’ levels doesn’t reveal the often dramatic impact that RINs can have on the market.

For example, in mid-January 2020, futures’ traders might typically have calculated a paper “crack” of $10.32 bbl versus WTI and $4.13 bbl against Brent. Those are the results of weighting a typical 3:2:1 crack where RBOB reflects 67% of the finished product barrel with 33% attributable to diesel. If one wanted to adjust for RFS compliance, the RVO was 2.454cts gal, which knocked off $1.03 bbl for each crack a little more than a year ago.

Fast forward to the last business day of January 2021. A mere glance at screen cracks yielded a products’ gross margin for WTI of $14.20 bbl with Brent yielding $10.55 bbl. Ostensibly, refiners were doing better than a year ago. But when the compliance cost of 13.55cts gal is integrated into the equation, the WTI crack gets sliced to $8.51 bbl while the Brent crack slips to $4.86 bbl.

In addition to the interplay that impact refinery margins, RINs can have some very drastic consequences for product importers or exporters.

For example, it’s clear that demand destruction for gasoline extends beyond North America to the Caribbean, Central America and South America, with destinations that court winter travelers particularly challenged.

Yet, OPIS parent company, IHS Markit, estimates that waterborne exports of gasoline and gasoline components exceeded 16 million barrels last month, rising by several million barrels from December 2020 and topping departures witnessed in January 2020.

“Without the exports, the US refining industry would be facing a lot of headwinds,” noted Debnil Chowdhury, IHS Markit executive director of refining and marketing.

Similarly, imports of gasoline or diesel are much more difficult to justify, given the costs that importers face on the RINs’ front.

Some other factors also are at work in the 2021 version of what some are again calling RINsanity.

Among the most notable:

  • The difference between the biofuels’ component and the price of the hydrocarbon blendstock is also a critical factor in driving RIN values, real refinery margins, and variable costs. Ethanol has been considerably more expensive than gasoline blendstock for most of the winter. The larger the gap, the more likely it is that RIN prices will rise, given that they represent a key lever in the blending equation.
  • Soybean oil has had several months of off-the-chart performance. Prices for bean oil are quoted in cents per pound, but one can get a per-gallon approximation by multiplying that number by 7.5. The spot price for soybean oil that was just 37.67cts/pound before Halloween rose to 45.58cts/pound last week. In cents per gallon, that’s a move of approximately 60cts. Generally, the greater the spread between bean oil and ULSD (or heating oil as it’s still known on CME), the more upward pressure on D4 (biodiesel) RINs. In the jargon of traders, you’ll hear lots of talk about the BOHO or HOBO spreads.
  • Rising RINs have an appreciable impact on other refined products. Jet fuel demand has tailed off drastically since the Christmas and New Year holidays, and yet jet fuel production (and imports) have risen, in part because a refiner doesn’t incur an RFS obligation when producing or importing jet fuel.
  • Some large retailers are beneficiaries of RINs that they get through blending biofuels or negotiations with refiners. Two companies that may report a big jump in RIN generation revenue in upcoming earnings’ calls are Murphy USA and Casey’s. Proceeds from the renewable credits can occasionally enhance fuel margins.

EBISnewsletter-screenshot-smallGet accurate, up-to-the minute news, pricing and analysis for buying and supplying ethanol-blended fuel and biodiesel with the OPIS Ethanol & Biodiesel Information Service.  This service includes real-time news alerts, end-of-day pricing assessments, and a weekly newsletter and rack pricing report. Sign up now for a free 3-week trial!

 

Tags: Renewables, Spot Market, Biofuels, Ethanol, RINs

    Subscribe to free OPIS Updates

    GAIN GREATER VISIBILITY INTO RINS, LCFS & CFP CREDIT TRADING AND LOWER YOUR COSTS

    OPIS-Trade-Link_laptop_opisnet

    OPIS Trade Link is a collaboration between OPIS and online trading platform OTC Direct that creates electronic trading for Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits under the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) as well as California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) and Oregon Clean Fuels Program (CFP) credits.

    RFS obligated parties, renewable fuel producers, and fuel distributors and retailers will see lower trading costs, increased visibility into the credit trading market, and improved daily price assessments from OPIS when they buy and sell compliance credits on OTC Direct.

    Request Free Access

    Follow Us

    Most Popular Posts